Discussion: Cinematography, Characterisation, Perspective (25 July 21)
I really am curious how people who watch Nevertheless, process the show. Beyond the aesthetics of Song Kang and Han So Hee, there is this rich storytelling, intentful photography and cinematography, and great writing of these very flawed characters.
Ahh agreed! Even though the general discourse seems to have gotten stuck on the red flag label that the Jae Eon character carries from the source material, I've had some really thoughtful conversations about the show's themes and inspired directorial choices. So good!
Yes! I've always seen "the red flags''
as part of a bigger narrative and
intentful characterisation of Jae-Eon.
I guess it really depends on the lens
you use to evaluate this series. If you
watch it with a third-party lens prying
into the lives of Na-Bi and Jae-Eon, then
you'll get sucked into that perspective:
Jae Eon as trouble for Na-Bi. But if you
look at it using Na-Bi's lens, as I feel like
the director intended it to be, you'll see
it through the rose-colored lenses of young, careless
attraction?
It actually ties really well with how the
visuals are treated in this drama. In
episodes 1-3, you'll see super close up shots
that are super hazy and intentionally
blurred -- Na-Bi's infatuation and
limerence for Jae--Eon is carefully translated
in these cinematographic choices.
Their interactions are always dark and
broody. But as the show progressed, the
shots became wider and less tight; the
haze also slowly disappeared. This
parallels Na-Bi "waking up" from the
Jae-Eon trance, now seeing his problematic
approach to relationships.
So much more to talk about these visual
themes with other characters! Also how
Na-Bi is as equally problematic as Jae-Eon.
People seem to identify with her, even when
she herself is a walking "red flag."
Yes! Amazing use of an unreliable narrator. Fascinating how this (+ the preconceived notions because of the webtoon) has made the story's themes on gossip/assumptions manifest in the audience discourse.
I'm watching from a non-amatonormative lens so Na-bi's "red flags" appear so much clearer to me. One moment she seems agreeable to their setup and is the one setting the boundaries, the next she's demanding sincerity then giving him the cold shoulder. Very hot and cold.
Na-Bi as a character is as problematic
as Jae-Eon and I’m living for that. The
audience don’t seem to see it prolly
because 1) they need attach to at least
one lead character and Na-Bi seems to
be the more obvious choice over the overt
assholery of Jae-Eon, and 2) the lens
most people use to look at this piece of work
is romantic.
If they just remove this and look at it
beyond amatonormativity, imagine the
conversations this could elicit.
Comments
Post a Comment